To abstract or not to abstract
The longer I’ve written software the more I debate with myself about whether I should be adding an abstraction or not adding an abstraction.
Let us define an abstraction, it could be an interface, a trait, a protocol, or an abstract class. It is a structure that defines how a piece of code should interact with the outside. But not how that interaction is handled.
Abstractions are a powerful tool, but they should be used appropriately. They are powerful at the boundaries of your code but introduce too much indirection when used overzealously.
A good abstraction lets a developer switch out an implementation without any effort. A bad abstraction finds a developer clicking through many files trying to a lot of information in their head.
I have a few rules of thumb that I try to follow:
-
An abstraction is useful when there is a genuine reason to swap out the implementation.
-
If you are at a boundary of a key separation of concern use an interface to define that boundary.
-
If you are designing a library use an abstraction to define a public API that can be added to or sensibly deprecated
-
If you know your class isn’t going to be swapped out don’t use an abstraction
These are not a definitive set of rules but I find they rein me in from creating an abstraction for everything under the sun!